The Lost Art of Homemaking

This morning, a friend and co-worker of mine (I will call her, DT) were having one of our morning coffee line chats.  Today’s topic of interest was what a luxury it is in this day and age to be a ‘stay at home mom’.  I have to admit that we vented (a little!) about how we often feel run off our feet between caring for our children, maintaining relationships, and taking care of the day-to-day tasks such as cooking, cleaning, dishes, laundry, paying bills, buying groceries, errands  and general home maintenance – while also working full time outside the home.  And we lamented the change in our society that has made the ability to be a stay at home parent/homemaker, rare.  We both agreed that, over the decades, it appears that being a homemaker has evolved into one of the least respected and underappreciated jobs in the world.  I mean, really…where else would a person work that hard only to go unpaid? And in contrast to those in the business world, be made feel to be uneducated, unproductive and not ‘professional’?

Not professional.  Hmmm…Meaning not an actual ‘profession’.  Ha!  The career of a homemaker has a major, important impact on the maintenance and wellbeing of others (encompassing the overall health, education, emotional and spiritual development of their family), combined with the general maintenance of the running of a house and family like overseeing a corporation.  Homemaking is one of the hardest, however most important and most rewarding jobs in the world.  A homemaker is a chef, a CEO, banker, teacher, doctor/nurse, contractor, maintenance supervisor, gardener…and the list goes on.  A homemaker is on call 24/7 – even when on vacation; their job goes with them.   People’s lives and well being are at stake – making it a huge responsibility, yet also very rewarding and empowering.  And while the personal rewards are great, homemakers rarely receive financial compensation for their efforts.  Yet, if you ask a homemaker what they do for a living, most will shyly respond with, “I work inside the home” or “I’m a stay at home parent” and conversations usually stop.

For such an important job, why are many stay at home parents geared to feel this way?  Feeling almost embarrassed to admit that they don’t ‘work’?

I ask this, because I have a childhood friend, (I will call her Betty), who is a stay at home parent.  To me she is a super-star! A rock star!  Her home is immaculate, her meals beautiful, healthy and well-planned, her laundry always caught up and her family so well cared for.  For her, her home and her family are her job.  And it’s a job in which she gives her all and takes the ultimate pride.  She is well-spoken, intelligent and beautiful.  Once, we were chatting and I was complaining about having to work full time and how much I envied her being a homemaker.  And in response, she confessed that there are times, when she actually feels embarrassed to tell people that she is a stay at home mom.  Some of the situations in which she feels this way, in particular, are when she is attending business functions with her partner.  The vast majority of the people attending would be business professionals with university degrees who work outside the home.  Polite chit-chat inevitably segues into ‘So, what do you do for a living?’  Most people comment that they are a manager or director of this, or a CEO of that, and Betty, on her turn, would bravely respond that she was a homemaker.  To which she would often get an “Oh….” or a “How nice.” And although it would never be verbally articulated, she would still get a feeling that they were saying (without actually saying) that what she did wasn’t as important as what they did – that of having a real job.  This upset me.  For while my friend doesn’t have a formal ‘degree’, she is well-educated and has attended university.  She acts as a teacher at home to children and can teach things in ways that I never could.  To me, her job is one of the most important in the world – caring for her family and shaping the lives of human beings.  So, I told her that the next time that something like that happened at one of those functions, she should just respond in a haughty voice and say, “Work?!  Oh no, dear.  I don’t HAVE to work.”  And then just sit back and smile.

Because, truly, in our present day society, being a stay at home parent really is a luxury that few can afford.  Or if you can’t afford it but still really want to do it, it can’t come without a certain amount of sacrifices.

Stay at home parents are usually:

  • A two-partner household where one partner makes a significant amount of money, enabling the whole family to easily live on one income
  • A two-partner household where the family has decided to make specific lifestyle sacrifices in order to live on budget so that one partner may stay at home.
  • The household is on a form of social assistance – which in our present society, has a negative stigma attached

But with how our society has evolved into a place where homemaking is undervalued and workaholics are revered, one wonders if our children are ‘missing’ anything.  Some might say that you can’t miss what you never had, however, sometimes it takes something like a movement or a subculture to subtly highlight the fact that we are missing something.  For during our morning coffee chat, DT also brought me up-to-date on something known as the ‘hipster movement’ – which she explained to me a group of individuals in the 20 to 30-something generation who are a bit artsy – in that they like anything natural and organic… they tend to be foodies and are drawn to anything that seems a little ‘old fashioned’.  They have honed the art of taking the time to put their ‘look’ together, without looking ‘put together’.  For example, you would see hipster men wearing home-made-looking knitted hats and sporting beards. (Aside: Did you know they are actually selling these hats with beards attached on Etsy!  Seriously?  OMG.).   She said it was like that generation has realized that there is something good and wholesome and natural that’s been intrinsically missing from our society – something ‘nurturing’ perhaps?  And they are trying to recapture that – such as diapering their children in cloth-only diapers and drinking their coffee or wine from Mason Jars!

The on-line Urban Dictionary defines Hipsters as “a subculture of men and women typically in their 20’s and 30’s that value independent thinking, counter-culture, progressive politics, an appreciation of art and indie-rock, creativity, intelligence, and witty banter.   Although “hipsterism” is really a state of mind, it is also often intertwined with distinct fashion sensibilities. Hipsters reject the culturally-ignorant attitudes of mainstream consumers, and are often be seen wearing vintage and thrift store inspired fashions, tight-fitting jeans, old-school sneakers, and sometimes thick rimmed glasses. Both hipster men and women sport similar androgynous hair styles that include combinations of messy shag cuts and asymmetric side-swept bangs. The “effortless cool” urban bohemian look of a hipster is exemplified in Urban Outfitters and American Apparel ads which cater towards the hipster demographic. Despite misconceptions based on their aesthetic tastes, hipsters tend to be well educated and often have liberal arts degrees, or degrees in maths and sciences, which also require certain creative analytical thinking abilities. Consequently many hipsters tend to have jobs in the music, art, and fashion industries. It is a myth that most hipsters are unemployed and live off of their parent’s trust funds”.  Hmmmm… I’m thinking that DT is a gal in the know – and her explanation was way more entertaining!

And while I don’t categorize myself as a ‘hipster’ by any stretch of the imagination, I do feel that one of the things we have lost over the years has been the Art of Homemaking.  Never quite seen as the ‘profession’ which it should have been – the art of nurturing and taking care of one’s family and home has unfortunately taken a backseat to:

  • Working outside the home for monetary compensation.  This is done in order to pay for the basic needs of life (or at least what is determined to be basic within the particular socioeconomic bracket in which you choose to live)
  • Or an obsessive drive to climb the ‘corporate ladder’ for reasons such as money, fame, ego, social respect, prestige, professional accolades… any rewards one would feel from being ‘out’ in the workforce, putting a career over family/home life.

Work outside the home has become such an unfortunate expectation of our society.  I’ve been to business functions and meetings where the topic of conversation always seems to become a ‘pissing contest’ of who is the most busy.  The most important people are simply run off their feet!  It’s considered a good thing to come in early, stay late and work through your lunches.  And for all the soap boxing that many corporations tout about ‘work life balance’ if you really look around your place of work, take a note to see which employees get promoted, and who appear to have the respect and awe of everyone else.  And you will probably find that vast majority of those people are the ones who have absolutely no work life balance.

And I have found this, personally to be sad, but true.  In my personal experience, I would love to be a homemaker/stay at home mom.  However, I also want to live in a certain area of the city.  I want this because of the convenience of where I live (walking distance to everything I need/want), an excellent school for my son and a neighborhood filled with good neighbors and children he has known since daycare and plays with every day.  I want to be able to take him on a vacation every year and I want to be able to afford for him to be able to participate in any extracurricular activities that he would like.  I also like some little perks for myself – like to have my hair colored and cut at a hair salon.  So in order to maintain this lifestyle (while not overly extravagant) I must work full time in order to have enough money pay a mortgage, and pay for heat, electricity, food, clothing, etc… All the basics one needs to live.

But all that being said, I still have a family and a home/property that needs taking care of – homemaking.  And that is where work/life balance becomes very important for me.  When I am at work, I work.  I put in my day.  I arrive when I’m supposed to, I take my lunch, (because I get a lunch) and I leave when it’s time to leave.  And because I have to and choose to work, it is very important to maintain this particular balance – because I work to maintain my lifestyle.  It is not my life.  My life is my family and my home.

I really feel that those people who can have one parent stay at home full time to devote themselves to being the primary hands-on caregiver for the home and family is so beautiful and such a luxury that I will admit, I’m a bit envious.  Like all jobs, there are good, mediocre and bad employees – some people go above and beyond, while others do the bare minimum.  And others, still, slack off whenever they can.

Similarly, this can be said of homemakers.  Some just take care of the basics, others may just throw in a load of laundry and proceed to sit on their ass and eat a tub of ice cream while watching Jerry Springer all day.  Yet there are others, still, who value this as their ‘job’ and take such pride and care in it.  And THOSE are the ones of whom I’m envious.  Sadly, the pay is all the same – whether you do a little or a lot – it’s still nil.  However, the personal satisfaction of a job well done in being able to undistractedly care for your home and family would be enormously rewarding.

I think of how much I could do:

  • Meal planning/making meals from scratch
  • Regularly scheduled daily cleaning rotations
  • Dropping my child off at school, picking him up for lunch and also being able to pick him up again, immediately when school was finished for the day.
  • Volunteering at my son’s school – class trips, in the classroom, fundraisers, etc…
  • Keeping up on household maintenance – any painting touch ups, etc…
  • Paying all the bills
  • Keeping up on the household filing
  • (And that is all I can think of off the top of my head!!)

Now, don’t get me wrong – I do my best.  I work all day and then run home after work to pick up my son and get supper.  Laundry is thrown in when we can and put it away when we can.  My son is taken to his sporting events, bills get paid, and when we have a few minutes here and there we run on the fly to get groceries or help out the grandparents.  However, the office is usually filled with unfiled papers, I frequently forget and/or miss appointments, and the ‘to do list’ is always a mile long.  I don’t get time to make cookies for the school bake sale and my son always has to remind me when it’s his gym day or library day…  And while he is clean, fed and happy, I don’t get to volunteer at his school, and I don’t always get time to read to him every night.  He is one of the first children at school in the morning and often one of the latest ones to leave, because I work.

I have heard fantastic rumors of some countries where a parent is actually paid to stay home.  Now, that is fair.  When I am actually home, I work.  There is never a shortage of things that need to be done and I am enthusiastic to do them.  I don’t know how true it is or have any facts on the country or countries that may or may not do this – mainly because I live in Canada and well…here in Canada we just don’t do that sort of thing (other than the standard 12 months of maternity leave) – which given the alternatives, we feel we’re pretty damn lucky to have!

When you think about it…a person is at home, caring for his/her family: cooking, cleaning, purchasing, making, organizing, volunteering, and being a large, positive presence in his or her child’s life.  And that kind of presence can’t be bad.  Additionally, if there are two parents, I think that the parent working ‘outside’ the home ultimately has less distractions and can more easily become a more productive employee.  For example, no more having to leave work early for medical or other family appointments, or to pick up a sick child from school, because there is a designated parent whose full time job it is to take care of those tasks.  No more sporadic lack of focus while at work, worrying about whether or not you put little Jimmy’s sun hat in his backpack this morning, or trying to figure out what you’re going to manage to whip up for supper that evening, or even if you have the particular ingredients in the fridge to make it…

And ultimately, healthy meals for all and no more latchkey kids  – I haven’t done a survey, but I would think that this would lead to better health, less drug/alcohol use in minors, less childhood obesity, and better health overall, leading to better academic achievement, appreciation of family, etc…  And these children, in turn would grow up to be the kind of people we want more of in this world.

However, in Canada (or any other country that I’m 100% aware of), no one is paid to stay at home and care for their family.  Unless they opt to go on social assistance – where there is such a negative social stigma attached, that those who do are often are made to feel degraded and ‘less than’ or just plain lazy.  But like I said – just there are good, mediocre and bad employees, there are good, mediocre and bad stay at home parents on social assistance.

And while Canada is a wonderful place to live – we have public schools for everyone, basic free Medicare, and forms of social assistance, I think that it’s kind of unfortunate that these benefits are the by-products of the systemic social problem of poverty in our country – contributing to a vicious circle of poor nutrition, education and health – requiring our society to NEED more Medicare, and social assistance.

I would like to think that someone in their vast wisdom could take a look at the possibility of paying a parent to stay home, considering it valuable work – and not a form of ‘social assistance’, and perform a study on how it, over time, impacts their society.  Are the children healthier, better educated and thus end up utilizing less social assistance in the future?  It would be an interesting study, for sure.  However, right now I’m too busy working full time and trying to keep my child fed and our house from falling down around us to undertake it…!


Viva Las Vegas!

As I said in my last post, Las Vegas was never on my top 10 list of places I really wanted to visit. However, when I had the unexpected opportunity to go, I thought, why not? Well…it made up for the Disney Debacle a thousand fold!

Getting older, I think I have developed certain ideas of what (for me, now) constitutes ‘fun’. In retrospect, perhaps I would have appreciated Disney World more as a child and thus experienced the magic though the eyes of a child… as my eyes are now somewhat more, ahem – ‘mature’.

So, as an adult, some of the things I have come to appreciate while on vacation are:
• I want to see and experience new things; have access to adventures when I want (with no serious issues or drama)
• I want time to relax, when I feel like it
• Do some shopping
• Eat good food
• Not feel too hot, cold or wet
• Have comfort and convenience

And Vegas delivered.

I tend to compare Las Vegas to Disney World in that each place is similarly designed to provide fun and entertainment and that things there are generally expensive. However, in Las Vegas you are not ‘trapped’ in a theme park and thus there are ways to make things more affordable, such as your meals.

Next in similarity were the line ups. Line ups are everywhere: the airport, security, customs, cabs, hotel check ins and outs, good restaurants, stores, etc… But unlike Disney, in Vegas the line ups moved FAST, and while I waited in them I was never too hot, wet or cold, and that’s always a bonus.

The first thing I noticed about Vegas was the smell. It smells expensive. Like a combination of freshness, expensive perfume and crisp paper money. All good to me. People can smoke in the casinos in Vegas, however, I didn’t smell one whiff of cigarette smoke, and being a non-smoker, that was great! And everyone was friendly. I assume that because people generally come to Vegas to have fun, they are all in a great mood and are thus, feeling super-friendly (and no, not grab your boobs, friendly!)

And unlike a theme park, all Vegas entertainment had nice comfy seats! If you are a parent and have ever taken your offspring to a theme park, you KNOW that sometimes the only ride you’re really interested in taking is the one where you get to sit on a bench for a minute and sip a cool drink! Well in Vegas there are cool drinks everywhere and you can sit down to eat, gamble (if you’re so inclined) or just sit down pretty much anywhere you want!

And the temperature! Wow! The temperature was absolutely perfect: hot, dry and sunny. Some people were complaining about the heat (it was over 40 most days), but for me it was a different kind of heat than I’ve ever experienced. I’ve lived in Newfoundland, Ontario, Nova Scotia, and British Columbia. I have also spent time down in Florida. So any amount of heat I’ve ever experienced has always come with copious amounts of humidity. And for someone with asthma, joint aches and chronically frizzy hair, humidity just plain sucks. However, even though it was extremely hot, without the humidity, it didn’t feel at all unpleasant. And no humidity meant feeling great and looking great every day! 

But, if ever at all you might be feeling a bit too warm, it’s easy to find somewhere to cool off. You can find air conditioning everywhere – people can meander freely in and out of shopping plazas, casinos and hotels – all smelling great and filled with air conditioning. If you’re thirsty, water is everywhere. Its ice cold and it tastes good. There are people up and down the streets selling water. At hotel pools there are free cups and water machines everywhere. It may not be environmentally friendly, but really… how environmentally friendly are vacation destinations unless they specifically advertise that?

Getting a cab was also pretty convenient – they were never hard to find. As there are so many fully staffed hotels and businesses, I never had any difficulty being shown to a cab or getting directions. And as security was everywhere, I always felt safe.

There is so much to see and do that you can be as busy or relaxed as you like! Sit by a pool for hours or go for a walk and see the sights. Every hotel on the strip has something fun to see – water and light shows, shopping, glass flowers, gardens, aquariums, animals, concerts, shows, nightclubs…the entertainment – both free and paying can be unending!

I didn’t get to do even half of all the things I wanted to, but like a child bitten by the Mickey Mouse Bug… I can’t wait to one day go back!

Disney World Debacle

It’s been awhile since I’ve blogged, but I have a good reason: Las Vegas. I was enjoying a little time away in Sin City – or what I like to call, Disney World for Grownups!

Hmmm. What can I say about Las Vegas. Well, it was never on my top 10 list of places I wanted to visit before I kick off. But now having been there, I’d go back in a heartbeat!

But I digress. Let me start from the beginning. I grew up poor…wait… fiscally challenged. Yes, that sounds much better – or at least politically correct, anyway! (Yeah, yeah, I know…cry me a river….!) And things being as such, all through my childhood I got to watch as friends and neighbors traveled regularly to Florida for their family vacations. They would all return with the customary tan, Mickey Mouse ears, general Disney swag and Ralph Lauren Polo shirts. I would always pour over their vacation photos and ask a million questions about Disney World. So they would show me the maps of the parks, tell me about the rides, the characters, etc… And a bit wistfully, I thought to myself that they were SO lucky!

Oh, how I longed to see Disney! And I knew I would, one day…

Eventually, I did get to visit Disney…but alas, it wasn’t until I was in my 30’s, when I went with my late husband. My husband had been one of those kids who regularly vacationed in Florida and had been to Disney many, many times. He had a saved his Mickey ears hat and from what I can understand, had more Ralph Lauren shirts than he ever wanted. But he really enjoyed Disney and was excited to take me on rides and show me around. I was excited to get to go and to do all the typical Disney things. However, after waiting all that time, sadly, Disney was NOTHING liked I’d hoped or dreamed of.

First of all, everything there was really expensive. You are confined to their world – their park and even a non-gourmet hamburger, fries and drink was expensive, not to mention greasy and boring. And everything required you to line up: parking, getting your park ticket, lining up for rides, lining up to get food or a bottle of water, lining up in the gift shop…etc…  And for the record, way too many (long) line ups in hot, humid weather tends to detract from the fun aspect.

So, we waited in the long line up for Space Mountain. My husband had loved Space Mountain as a child. It was his favorite and he wanted to show me its awesomeness. I was a bit hesitant; because I have a bit of a predisposition to vertigo. However, I wanted this to be fun for him, too, and since it had always been his favorite Disney ride, I stepped up. Unfortunately, I was correct in my suspicion that I would get motion sick. And, while I didn’t vomit, I sure as hell wanted to.

So, after I staggered off the ride, “taking all sides of ‘er” as we say in Newfoundland, I sat under a tree for a little shade while my husband lined up to get me a bottle of cold water. As I tried to stifle my nausea beneath the tree, a bird that was perched up in the tree, decided to crap all over my arm. Awesome. So, I sat there, my arm covered in bird poo for a few minutes, until my husband returned from the latest line up with some bottled water and napkins.  I was able to use it to clean myself up until I could get to a proper washroom.

So, If the Foo Shits, Wear it:

Cleaned up and for the most part, undeterred, we consulted our map and continued to walk the park. Still slightly nauseaous, my enthusiasm returned when I remembered that I had always wanted to have my picture taken with some of the Disney characters. But alas, like a big, wet blanket on my childhood dream, it was not to be. For on that particular day, the vast majority of the characters were all busy filming commercials. Well, I guess even the Mouse has gotta’ work for his cheese…right?

Then, speaking of wet…not long after that, the sky suddenly opened up and it rained. No, not rained. It TORRENTIALLY rained. Within about 7 seconds we were completely soaked to the skin. My husband purchased (and they were very expensive, I might add!) two bright yellow plastic rain ponchos, complete with Mickey Mouse emblazoned on the back for use to wear. Within about 10 minutes, the idea had caught on, and we were soon swallowed up into a sea of yellow ponchos.

As you can imagine, I was feeling a little unpleasant by now. Disney had NOT lived up to my childhood fantasies in any way. I was nauseated, hot, pooped on, disappointed, soaked to the skin and now, over it all, was wrapped in bright yellow plastic.

However, not to be deterred, my husband thought that since we were there, we should just suck it up and keep going on rides. He chose the ‘It’s a Small World’ ride, as it was an indoor ride. So, after yet another line up, there we were…tucked into a small boat with several other people, all soaked to the skin and covered in yellow plastic ponchos…which, now, thanks to the heat, had turned into our own personal steam baths. And as we sat there, damp and steaming, sailing through the stagnant smelling water, the song, “It’s a Small World, Afterall”, torturously played over and over and over. I sat sulking, soggy and contemplating if this was actually Hell…

I had finally had enough. I was ready to burst and began voicing my numerous complaints about this entire debacle of an excursion. Well, by that time, my husband had had enough, and told me to shut up, stop complaining and just try to enjoy the ride. Oddly, that didn’t help matters and the next thing you know, before you could say M-I-C-K-E-Y, we are sniping (and trying not to yell) at each other through clenched teeth – in this boat full of soaking people…while, still, “It’s a Small World, Afterall” played on and on.

Later that day, the rain finally stopped, the sun returned and we could remove our plastic wrap, and reclaim our individuality. And with our clothes baked onto our bodies and my hair looking similar to the mane of the Lion King… we were finally picked up to go home. I rejoiced. And I have never had much of an urge to go back to Disney again.

Now many years later, my young son delights in my tales of woe about Disney World, laughing hysterically picturing me being pooped on. And in order to hopefully provide him with some amount of non-bias, he has also been exposed to numerous commercials and pictures showing how wonderful and magical Disney World can be. I have taken him to Florida many times and have even offered to take him to Disney World. But each time he has politely declined, preferring another activity or park, and I have to say, I can’t help but feel grateful.

Social Media: Are You Tough Enough?

First and foremost, I’m a mom to a beautiful, active 7-year old. I’m also over 40, I work full time outside the home, am a part-time university student, and I have a partner and a house that frequently need attention. I’m also the only child to an elderly parent. So, in short, not only am I unaware of all the different avenues of social media out there, but I also I don’t have a lot of free time to be up-to-date on all the do’s and don’ts of what I actually do know!

I admit, I’ve been on Facebook for a few years, but mainly because it’s been such an efficient way to stay in touch with friends and family. With one quick post, they all know I’m still alive and well, and I can get back to the pressing duties at hand of making supper, wiping a runny nose or doing laundry.

Lately, I had been thinking it was high time to attempt an exploration of our expansive world of social medial and thought I’d start off with the basics. So, I created an account on one of the more popular sites: Twitter. And as confusion set in early, between hashtags, cryptic posts and how to get more ‘followers’, I attempted to read a few articles on social media: the etiquette of, what you should and should not post, as well as how to make your posts more interesting. All too quickly, I found out that posting is an art… and apparently a lot of work. How did I not know all this before!? Apparently, I was supposed to have been entertaining, exciting and “read-worthy”!?! Damn.

Ugh. Let’s face it. Social media is kind of like word of mouth on steroids. It can either make or break you (or your business). For some, like me, it had been a fun, efficient way to stay in touch with people. But for others, it can act as something of a virtual canvas – where they can paint themselves into who they see themselves as, who they have always wanted to be, or how they want to be seen by others. Talk about PRESSURE… with the expectation to either appear to have a fabulous life or to have one that is at least entertaining enough to make others want to read more!?!

So, with that kind of pressure, it looks to me that a lot of people out there may feel that they have to try and fit themselves into an image of what our present society sees as, (at this moment) being either ‘cool’, ‘in’ or ‘now”. There will always be some new bandwagon to jump on (ie. environmentalism, new charities, going all-organic, saving whales or seals, etc…) and by hitching your wagon to the right ‘star’, it can be a way of feeling some sort of personal validity and letting others know: I am liked. I am popular. I ‘belong’.

But, if that’s so, and I should be thinking through that lens whenever I post anything, am I really being authentic or am I putting unnecessary pressure on myself just for the sake of my ‘audience’ or obtaining more followers? Now, my head hurts.

Let me be perfectly clear: I’m certainly not saying that all ‘bandwagons’, (and by that I mean ‘movements’), are bad. A great many of them are absolutely wonderful and help our world tremendously. It’s just that not everyone who considers themselves part of these movements does so because they truly believe in them or live the lifestyle. They see them as things that all the ‘cool’ people are part of and talking about, and they want to be seen in that way also. So, they may post or re-tweet about all those things, but as for being part of their nitty-gritty movements…well, lets’ just say that I know some of them…and while they may ‘talk the talk’, they don’t necessarily ‘walk the walk’…in my mind, kind of like a person who talks a lot about being a vegetarian yet still wears leather!

And while I like to be entertained (who doesn’t?!), I’m also a huge fan of authenticity. I have great admiration for those who do talk the talk and walk the walk. And I would rather know that a friend is posting honestly about their day and not treating me like an audience by feeding me a candy-coated version of it, just because they think it will make it more ‘readable’. I want to be a friend, not an audience. But I guess that’s where people differ: Some want connections and some want an audience. But between Facebook and Twitter, that line can sometimes become a bit blurry and I guess we all have our motives for posting whatever we post.

During my time on Facebook, I’ve often heard friends ridicule or complain about other friends or acquaintances’ posts, saying, “Really? Why would I care that Ms. Rigby’s cat just puked or that she had mac & cheese for supper?”

Hmm. Well, maybe you don’t care that Ms. Rigby’s cat just puked or about what she ate for supper. But truth be told, it happened. It was real. So, you’ve got to give Ms. Rigby some credit. And maybe just because you don’t care…perhaps somebody else does.

Likely, dear Ms. Rigby wasn’t trying to impress anyone or spin her life into some glamorized tale just to entertain others or make anyone think she is special. She was probably just trying to ‘connect’ and share her life, perhaps hoping that someone…anyone may have cared. And apparently, she hasn’t read any of the “How To” Literature on posting and social media! But in spite of all that, I have to have a certain amount of respect for her posts; because consciously or not, she put herself out there. And social media isn’t for the faint of heart.

Whenever you post, there’s always a little piece of yourself that you are opening up to the entire world for them to either like, dislike or ridicule…. You open yourself up to friends, family, acquaintances, co-workers, strangers, and anyone who has ever loved or hated you – either openly or from afar. And a post like that is saying, “I am real. This is my life. It may not be glamorous, but it’s who I am.”

The fictional Ms. Rigby was not trying to paint herself as super-exciting, and her posts may likely be written without any thought that it could be annoying to anyone else. So, in my heart of hearts, to make the time to ridicule someone for their authenticity in posting is actually pretty mean. If you are that bored by someone or don’t like something they have said, you have some options. You can either de-friend them or change your settings so you don’t see them or their posts anymore.

In short…maybe many of us, myself included, are simply over-thinking this whole thing. Whatever, whenever and however you decide to post, and your motives for doing so – be them self-serving, authentic or even without thought… I guess, if you’re going to be brave enough to let the world in… you have to be tough enough to take whatever comes from it.

Elder Abuse in Nova Scotia: Journey on the Path to Policy

Nova Scotia’s Aging Population:

Every month, there are 700 Nova Scotians who turn 65. (Discussion Paper for Positive Aging in Nova Scotia, 2004, p. 1). In 2005 in Nova Scotia “there were 132,600 seniors and that number is expected to double by 2026.” (Nova Scotia Elder Abuse Strategy: Towards Awareness and Prevention, 2005, p. 8)

That being said, with the numbers of older adults rapidly increasing, and given the multiple cuts to our healthcare system, it isn’t surprising that our government has been giving some serious thought to the potential drain that a large number of older adult Nova Scotians could have not only to the healthcare system, but to pensions, nursing homes, paid elder care, etc… and would naturally look to develop new ideas and initiatives in order to alleviate the ways that the older adult population will apparently deplete our welfare state, while still being able to live better quality lives while using less resources. So, in anticipation of an increase in the older adult population, in 2004 a Discussion Paper for Positive Aging in Nova Scotia was written – and was noted to have been completed through working with and receiving input from the Nova Scotia older adult community, themselves and subsequent to that, many more documents, reports, strategies and initiatives have been drafted and publicized to the same effect. (See Appendix I)

But while “older people are not only perceived as a burden on society, [in an effort to try and assume some agency, it appears as though they might be] increasingly exhorted, or [even] choose, to become involved in “successful aging” [initiatives] which [would] enable them to remain independent as long as possible. (Harbison, 2008, p. 3) So, with the notation of community assistance from the older adult population, one of the strategies put forth by the government was that of keeping seniors in their own homes longer and also encouraging family members (as unpaid caregivers) to take on the bulk of their care.

Elder Care:
In Canada’s Aging Population: Seizing the Opportunity, Marcus J. Hollander notes,
“Taking the time to give a senior who needs care, a bath, preparing a meal, feeding the individual and ensuring a safe and sanitary environment in the home does not necessarily have to be done by a health professional. However, for people who are too frail to shop, cook or take baths on their own due to their medical conditions, this type of personal support allows them to maintain their independence for as long as possible. It may actually save the health care system money by avoiding repeated hospital admissions and premature entry into long-term care facilities.”(Canada’s Aging Population: Seizing the Opportunity,2009, p. 51)

The demand for caregivers paid and unpaid, will continue to grow. Families can expect to continue to play a large role in providing care. And in fact, 70 percent of Canadian baby boomers can expect to care for an older family member in their near future. The number of caregiver households in Canada had tripled since 1987, and then doubled again by 2007. Of note, women make up 61 percent of caregivers, with 64 percent of them working full time, and 42 percent raising children under the age of 18. The delicate art of balancing a full-time job with raising children and providing care to older adults brings significant challenges and the Nova Scotia government does acknowledge the obvious, indicating that they do believe that greater efforts must to be made in order to ease this burden. (Discussion Paper for Positive Aging in Nova Scotia, 2004 p. 15/16) – And while back in 2004 some goals had been recommended, it is now 2011 and affirmative action on the bulk of these goals has not yet fully transpired. Some of these goals were:

Community Care Options:
(Discussion Paper for Positive Aging in Nova Scotia, 2004 p. 15/16)
1. Develop standards and monitor compliance to ensure boarding homes and assisted living facilities provide seniors with a safe and secure residence quality services, and quality of life.
2. Respect individual autonomy, enhance empowerment, and maximize functional capacity of seniors in long-term care facilities (e.g. offering rehabilitation, providing accommodations for couples, respecting cultural beliefs and traditions, and facilitating access to the community outside the facility.
3. Increase opportunities to provide support for self-care, care provided by family and friends, and formal care provided by paid providers
4. Increase awareness among Nova Scotians of the home care support options available to them.

Family Caregivers:
(Discussion Paper for Positive Aging in Nova Scotia, 2004 p. 15/16)
5. Provide appropriate education and supports, such as tax credits, in-home assistance, expanded respite care, adult day care, employment leave benefits, and continued pension benefits, so caregivers (family and friends) can carry out their responsibilities as family members and citizens’ without compromising their own financial security or health.
6. Help small businesses identify affordable ways to create family-friendly workplaces that accommodate the needs of workers with caregiving responsibilities.
7. Ensure special provisions for child care benefits relating to the care of a dependent child also apply to caring for a senior family member.

And while many family members are happy to take on the care of their older family members, some may not find this such an easy or even wanted, task. And other’s still may do so out of obligation to family; however do so at their own financial or personal detriment. And if that is so, situations such as these have much potential to create an inordinate amount of stress on family caregivers and families. And while there is no excuse for elder abuse, caregivers being subject to high amounts of stress and frustration, combined with lack of resources, finances, respite care, etc… could inadvertently perpetuate the abuse of an elder.

And it just may be that the government has considered this potential possibility – admitting that “on occasion, the abuse might arise due to an inability on the part of the caregivers to cope with the many stresses of providing care. While the stress of providing care is real, it never justifies an abusive response.” (Canada’s Aging Population: Seizing the Opportunity, 2009, p. 26). So on “June 15, 2007, the Nova Scotia Department of Seniors launched its new senior abuse awareness campaign [entitled, Respect]. The campaign [aimed] to give a face to senior abuse, to bring it out into the open, to expose this often hidden injustice. By putting a face on the issue, it is no longer anonymous”. (Senior Abuse Awareness Campaign, 2009) So along with the Strategy for Positive Aging; additional strategies, reports, initiatives and awareness campaigns (such as Respect) were simultaneously rolled out to the public (via television, print media, web media, etc…) in order to bring attention to the topic of elder abuse. The media showed faces of downtrodden elderly persons, being physically grabbed, yelled at and looking frightened, despondent, sad and hopeless. Yet, in reality, if only abuse could be so easily recognized.

Elder Abuse Defined:

Through this campaign, the types of elder abuse were outlined in detail:
Elder abuse is defined as “any action by someone in a relationship of trust that results in harm or distress to an older person. Neglect is a lack of action by that person in a relationship of trust with the same result”. (Nova Scotia Elder Abuse Strategy: Towards Awareness and Prevention, 2005, p. 9 – 10) “It is believed that at least between 4% and 10% of older adults experience abuse. However, “because abuse and neglect are thought to be seriously under-reported, these figures are often challenged”. (Senior Abuse Awareness & Prevention, 2011)

Commonly recognized types of elder abuse include:
1. Physical Abuse – “the infliction of pain, injury or discomfort or an older adult. It can involve physical assault (eg. Hitting, shaking, pulling, hair pulling, rough handling), medication abuse (over/under medication), physical restraint, and medical maltreatment.”
2. Emotional/Psychological Abuse – “the infliction of anguish or emotional pain. It can involve name calling, humiliation, threats or intimidation, provoking fear, emotional deprivation, treating the older person like a child, and isolation.”
3. Sexual Abuse – “any form of sexual activity with a person without the consent of that person. It can include unwanted sexual touching, sexual relations with voluntary consent, or the forcing or coercing of degrading humiliating, or painful sexual acts.”
4. Financial Abuse – “the unethical or illegal misuse of the money, property, or other financial assets of an older adult, including placing inappropriate pressure on an older person in order to gain access to her or his assets.”
5. Neglect – “the failure to provide the necessities of life such as proper food, fluids, suitable clothing, a safe and sanitary place of shelter, proper medical attention, personal care, and necessary supervision.
6. Violation of Human/Civil Rights – “the unlawful or unreasonable denial of the fundamental rights and freedoms normally enjoyed by adults. It can involve denial of information, denial of visitors; denial of opportunity for religious worship, denial of the right to provide informed consent to medical treatment, interference with mail, or unwarranted confinement in a hospital or institution”.
(Nova Scotia Elder Abuse Strategy: Towards Awareness & Prevention, 2005, p. 9 – 10)

And it was often noted that more than one type of abuse occurs at the same time. And abuse can occur as either a single incident or a repeated pattern of behavior. (Elder Abuse: It’s time to Face the Reality, 2011)

It was also noted, again as above, that elder abuse is often caused by someone the older person knows and trusts, such as a family member, a friend; a health care provider (ie. home care or institutional setting) or someone who provides them with basic needs assistance. In some situations, the abuser is often dependent on the elder financially or for food or housing. (Elder Abuse: It’s time to Face the Reality, 2011)

The Abusers:

So, conclusively if older adults are most often abused by a family member or by someone they know, due to the healthcare cuts in our welfare state (ie. lack of free or affordable and timely home care/respite care) the elder abuse strategy could be viewed, as, in itself, a form of abuse. Lack of resources in the form of respite care, etc… (other than private care that many cannot afford) mean that families may have to provide the bulk of the care to the older adult. This can be a tremendous source of stress for a care giver, especially if the older adult has a physical limitation or degree of dementia. In a sense, it appears as though families are being set up for the difficulty, stress and frustration that could potentially lead to abuse. And while this again, is no excuse for elder abuse, frustration and fatigue can sometimes give way to inadvertent abuse of an older adult by a caregiver – resulting in even one isolated incident.

Consider this situation:
“A son who physically neglects his elderly, disabled mother, berates her for allowing his stepfather’s bad treatment of him, and defrauds her of her pension, may be seen not only as a criminal, but as an unemployed person of poor education in an ageist society. He may also be understood as someone of limited social and intellectual abilities and the object of long-term mental and physical abuse by his mother’s ex-partner. In his mother’s perception, the son may be seen as a protector against the ex-partner and as representing the last vestiges of her family life. She may also feel tremendous guilt as a result of the abuse he suffered. The mother in this situation cannot be seen only as the subject of family dysfunction to be treated, as a victim of family violence to be rescued, or as a victim of a criminal act of fraud who should seek legal redress. She is also a person in complex and difficult circumstances who has the right to make choices, for instance not to charge her son and go on living in neglect. From a legal point of view her rights should be acknowledged and discussed with her. From a socio-psychological point of view her own understanding of her well-being should be respected.” (Harbison, 2008, p. 4)

The above example of a case of elder abuse highlights the fact that situations of abuse can be much more ambiguous and complex than the written definitions and pictures.

Additionally, Government strategy also puts forth in a positive light that “seniors contribute enormously to their families, often through direct financial contributions in the form of substantial loans and gifts, and in important and valuable in-kind services, such as childcare.” (Discussion Paper for Positive Aging in Nova Scotia, 2004, p. 8) So, under this gaze, the government is praising older adults for their contribution to their families, however by what they have already outlined as acts that would fall into their categories of elder abuse – to some this could also be construed as either financial abuse or even a violation of the elder’s rights in their unpaid care for grandchildren. One potential view could be that the older adult may have worked hard all their life and could use more leisure time, however because of their love for their grandchildren and/or guilt or a need to feel they are contributing, will provide this unpaid labor.

So, from the images alone present in the media along with the government definitions provided, elder abuse, on the surface appears to be relatively easy to spot and define – similar to woman abuse – as we have all seen the posters, brochures and images in the media of women who have experienced spousal abuse – pictured with bruising, tears, and a frightened, hopeless expression.

Reportability of Elder Abuse:

However, what makes elder abuse different from woman abuse is that elder abuse is reportable by law under the Adult Protection Act or (or in a seniors complex, the Protection of Persons in Care Act), yet woman abuse is not. The Adult Protection Act was designed to help protect adults who are unable to protect themselves – someone over the age of 16 years who is neglected or abused and cannot physically or mentally protect or care for him or herself. In most cases, it does not apply to adults who are mentally competent and the act will only include financial abuse if it is in conjunction with one of the more visible forms of abuse. Oddly enough, when a woman is abused by her spouse, oftentimes she is unable to physically and mentally protect herself from both the physical and psychological scars of abuse – however, the Act does not apply to her. (Appendix II)

For, if a younger woman presented in a physician’s office with suspicious bruises and was questioned by the physician in order to determine potential abuse, even if abuse was obvious, if the woman was unwilling to admit abuse, the abuse would not be reported. However, if a child of this woman was involved in the abusive situation, this abuse must be legally reported. Alternately, if an older woman, 65 years or older (who had either a physical limitation or mental limitation – such a varied degree of dementia) presented in a physician’s office with the same suspicious bruising, if the physician believed that the woman was abused, the physician would be legally bound to report this, whether the elderly woman admitted to being abused or whether she consented to the reporting of the abuse or not. So while the government is proclaiming a positive stance on aging achieved partly by actively listening to and incorporating the opinions and voices of our elderly, this legal reportability distinctly sends the opposite message that ambiguous groupings of elderly can be viewed as children; without their own voice, and needing the protection of others in a position of power.

As noted above, it is felt that between 4 – 10% of seniors experience some form of abuse. However, “because abuse and neglect are thought to be seriously under-reported, these figures are often challenged”. ( So although elder abuse is reportable, it isn’t always reported – and with families and their intricate complexities involved, it isn’t difficult to understand why this is so. “Older adults may feel ashamed or embarrassed to tell anyone they are being abused by someone they trust. They may fear retaliation or punishment, or they may have concerns about having to move from their home or community. They may also feel a sense of family loyalty. Often, older adults may not be aware of people and resources that can help.” (Senior Abuse Awareness & Prevention, 2011) Or they are often afraid to say anything because of ‘the devil you know’ mentality. Then, add in the fact that some older adults could have varying degrees of dementia – which could make the discerning of abuse, more difficult. Furthermore, if abuse is noted, reported and the older adult is removed from the abusive situation what particular steps or system (if anything) is put in place to make life any better for this person? The older adult could be removed from the familiar (which could be anywhere along a broad spectrum of unpleasant) to the unfamiliar – and who is to say that this would any better for the older adult – as people are all individuals and have different personal preferences of how and where they would prefer to live. This could create an unknown and potentially very stressful situation for the older person. And depending on the extent of the abuse (ie. financial or verbal vs. extreme physical abuse) the older person may prefer to stay in an environment where they are financially abused as opposed to being placed in an unfamiliar senior’s home or moved from their own community.

This position creates a tension – on the one hand the government is trying to give the impression that older adults are still vital, active members of society who can work longer, live in their own homes longer – and thus will not need to rely so much on ‘the system’ – trying to step “outside of the dominant discourse (which understands older people as frail, vulnerable, dependent, and incapable of full participation in decisions involving their own lives or in society.” (Harbison, 2008, p. 3) While, on the other hand, with their strategy on elder abuse, “the views and wishes of seniors are themselves are not prominent. It has been suggested that professional/legal responses to what has come to be known as ‘elder abuse and neglect’ and which are associated with institutionally based programs can promote dis-empowerment of older people through ageist assumptions and behaviors” (Harbison, 2008, p. 4) where the senior is treated as being the mental equivalent of a child. And once one begins to actually break down and study the forms of elder abuse, the abuser, the strategies designed to end elder abuse and the legal reporting process of said abuse – its definition, provability and the ability to achieve the best outcome for the senior, becomes a slippery slope of murky ambiguity, with no clear-cut solution.

Present State of Ambiguity = No Policy:

So, with all that is being done to put an end to elder abuse, Nova Scotia is left with the burning question – how helpful have the strategies and awareness campaigns for elder abuse really been? It has been 9 years since The (2005) Nova Scotia Elder Abuse Strategy: Towards Awareness and Prevention document indicated that its future action [would] be to “advocate for the development of policies that prevent and respond to elder abuse and contribute to the protection of older adults, ensuring that they reflect and address the very broad scope of issues inherent in elder abuse” (p. 3) however, this has not yet transpired and the province is still without its own policy on elder abuse. One may wonder what good are strategies and awareness if they are not policy. Well, I believe the answer to that is that when strategy is combined with legal reportability – while a policy is ideal, it becomes less of a priority. And to further understand why I believe a policy has not yet been developed, one must understand the difference between a strategy and a policy.

What is a Strategy?

“Strategies are the “hows” of pursuing a mission and achieving goals. A strategy is a managerial action plan for achieving targeted outcomes, mirrored in the pattern of moves and approaches devised to produce desired results. It is a long term plan of action designed to achieve a particular goal. Strategy is differentiated from tactics or immediate actions with resources at hand by its nature of being extensively premeditated, and often practically rehearsed. Strategies are used to make the problem easier to understand and solve”. (Webster’s On-Line Dictionary 2011)

What is a Policy?

“Policy is a definite course or method of action selected from among alternatives and in light of given conditions to guide and determine present and future decisions. It is a high-level overall plan embracing the general goals and acceptable procedures especially of a governmental body.” (Merriam Webster On-Line Dictionary 2011) Policies frequently have side effects or unintended consequences. Therefore a policy formulation process is typically followed, which would include attempts to assess as many areas of potential policy impact as possible, and to lessen the chances that a given policy will have unexpected or unintended consequences. Because of the nature of some complex adaptive systems such as societies and governments, it may not be possible to assess all possible impacts of a given policy. (Webster On-Line Dictionary 2011)

So, despite the fact that the Nova Scotia government moves back and forth between its view and portrayal of older adults as both active, vital members of our society and then as frail, dependent and unable to make their own decisions, given the above explanations, it is understandable that there is not, as of yet, a policy on elder abuse. I believe that the reason for this is that because elder abuse is so under reported, the circumstances that perpetuate the abuse are so diverse, and while some forms of abuse (ie. physical, sexual, and neglect can be more towards the obvious) – other forms such as financial, emotional/psychological and violation of rights, can be more difficult to discern. And while the present strategies continue to be implemented, tested and reviewed for efficacy, the government has achieved what it has outlined as its main goal in that it has “appropriate legislation in place to protect all seniors from abuse and neglect and ensure appropriate supports available to assist victims of abuse. [It also feels it has developed] effective strategies to prevent and remedy the consequences of abuse, including increasing knowledge among caregivers, care providers, the media and the general public about the problem of abuse and neglect, how to spot abusive situations and how to provide the necessary support to victims.” (Discussion Paper for Positive Aging in Nova Scotia, 2004, p. 27)

The government and our policy makers must remember and hold high their own statement that “every situation of abuse is unique… there is no one single response to senior abuse.” (Senior Abuse Awareness & Prevention 2011) Therefore, time and very careful consideration must be given to the development of an actual policy on elder abuse. The more the strategies are tested, the better the chance of developing a stronger policy with hopefully less in the way of negative side effects.

Overall, I believe that bringing awareness to the subject of elder abuse has been helpful in the respect that hopefully those providing care to older adults and experiencing high levels of stress or lack of resources in their care giving roles can, in a moment of frustration, having a better knowledge of what constitutes abuse, can take a step back and just breathe, take a moment and decide not to cause hurt or harm. And that if older adults are aware of what actually constitutes abuse, if they wish to do so, they can understand how to make themselves more informed or reach out for help, if desired. However, the government should more clearly outline what can and does often happen to the older adult once an allegation of abuse has been confirmed. The older adult has a right to know what to fully expect as an outcome from ending an abusive situation. Also, if the government is going to push for more older adults to be cared for by unpaid caregivers, more so than a policy on elder abuse, priority and clearly implemented solutions need to acted upon in order to provide the much needed support for these families to alleviate the financial, physician and emotional burden of providing care.

Appendix I

Government Documents on Positive Aging/Elder Abuse:
1. Discussion Paper for Positive Aging in Nova Scotia (2004)
2. Strategy for Positive Aging in Nova Scotia (2005)
3. Nova Scotia Elder Abuse Strategy: Towards Awareness and Prevention (2005)
4. “On June 15, 2007, the Nova Scotia Department of Seniors launched its new senior abuse awareness campaign entitled, Respect.
5. Government of Canada – The National Senior’s Council: Report of the National Seniors Council on Elder Abuse (November 2007)
6. Special Senate Committee on Aging (Final Report) – Canada’s Aging Population: Seizing the Opportunity (April 2009)
7. The Chief Public Health Officer’s Report on the State of Public Health in Canada 2010: Growing Older – Adding Life to Years (2010)

Appendix II:

Key Legislation (for Nova Scotia) Regarding Elder Abuse:
• Adult Protection Act, R.S.N.S 1989, c.2
• Protection for Persons in Care Act, S.N.N. 2004, c. 33
• Protection for Persons in Care Regulations, N.S. Reg. 364/2007
• Domestic Violence Intervention Act, S.N.S. 2001, c. 29
• Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, S.N.S. 1993, c. 5
• Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act, S.C. 2000, c.5 [Federal Act]
(Strategies for Occupational Therapists to Address Elder Abuse/Mistreatment. Provincial Legal Information: Nova Scotia 2011)


Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists. (2011). Strategies for Occupational Therapists to Address Elder Abuse/Mistreatment.
Government of Canada. (2011). Elder Abuse: It’s Time to Face the Reality. Retrieved from
Government of Nova Scotia. (2011). Senior Abuse Awareness Campaign. Retrieved from
Government of Nova Scotia. (2011). Senior Abuse Awareness and Prevention. Retrieved from
Harbison, J. (2008). Models of Intervention for “Elder Abuse and Neglect”: A Canadian Perspective on Ageism, Participation, and Empowerment. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, 10:3 – 4, 1 – 17.
Nova Scotia Task Force on Aging. (2004). Discussion Paper for Positive Aging in Nova Scotia.
Merriam Webster On-Line Dictionary. (2011). Policy. Retrieved from
Senior’s Secretariat, Province of Nova Scotia. (2005). Nova Scotia Elder Abuse Strategy: Towards Awareness and Prevention.
The Special Senate Committee on Aging, Ottawa, Canada. (2009). Canada’s Aging Population: Seizing the Opportunity. Retrieved from
Webster’s On-Line Dictionary. (2011). Policy and Strategy. Retrieved from

Significant messages hidden beneath the hilarity and stereotypical extremist portrayal of women and aging in the film “Death Becomes Her”

Western “contemporary standards for female beauty dictate slenderness/thinness, youth, whiteness, upper class status (in that one must be able to spend considerable amounts to adhere to beauty standards) and [exhibit] no noticeable physical imperfections or disabilities.”(Dillaway P. 4) 

The movie, Death Becomes Her is a dark comedy released in 1992 that spoofs the western concept of ageism, body concealment and discourses of loss and decline.  The film revolves around the lives of the two predominant female characters in the film: Madeline Ashton, (an actress) played by Meryl Streep and Helen Sharp (a writer), played by Goldie Hawn – two upper class, white women who are growing older, the distress they feel about getting older and their desperation for eternal youth at any cost.  These two characters have been lifelong ‘friends’– in the sense that while they have been  in each other’s lives since childhood, their relationship is steeped in a long history of jealousy, rivalry, competition and obsessive one-upmanship.

This film takes to the extreme, every conceivable stereotypical issue that a western woman could have as set out by western society, amplifying them to the point of hilarity.  Obsessions with one’s appearance – the desire to remain young, beautiful and sexually appealing, jealousy and competition between women in regards to male partners, life circumstances, successes, etc…, and how women will often ‘hold grudges’, and occasionally engage in ‘cat-fights’ over these issues.  And additionally, how women will viciously verbally attack each other, under the passive-aggressive pretext of friendliness and reverse compliments, in order to “assault [each other’s] self esteem” (Dillaway P. 5) by use of cutting remarks about weight/physical appearance, social status, employment status, etc…  The film and the female characters in it spoof the antiquated western impression that this is just the way that women naturally are, for example when Helen berates Madeline for her home wrecking, man-eating ways , she says what can you expect?… “after all, she is a WOMAN!” (Zemeckis 1993) 

So, while all these stereotypical issues are prevalent in the film, they all stem from the main issues of ageism, body concealment and discourses of loss and decline.  How these two characters obsess over the aging process translates in how they continue to relate to and interact with each other – a vicious cycle of even more jealousy, rivalry and competition.  As in when faced with the prospect of seeing each other at a party for the first time in many years, Madeline heads to an extreme spa in a desperate attempt to look youthful when she sees Helen.  Unbeknownst to Madeline, Helen, who has always been jealous of Madeline’s beauty, has already consumed a potion to make her look younger and more attractive than Madeline.  At the party, Madeline exclaims in a surprised tone to Helen, “It’s been 12 years…you have a waist!”  To which Helen replies, “I was so worried that you might not come [to the party]…but my PR woman said that Madeline Ashton comes to the opening of an envelope!  I almost fired her.  Well, almost.” (Zemeckis 1993)

Ageism is immediately prevalent straight on from the first scene, where Madeline, an actress approaching middle age, is performing on stage on Broadway.  People are leaving the theatre – disgusted by how old they think she looks, making comments like, “talk about raising the dead!” (Zemeckis 1993) implying that a woman her ‘age’ has no business acting sexy or performing in public.  According to “Friedan (1993) [he] contended that editors, art directors, ad agency executives and advertisers shared a belief that the face of any ‘older’ woman (than sixty, fifty, forty?) was an object of revulsion to Americans” (Hurst & Andsagar P. 103) and this is reflective of the attitude of the public in the film that older women should just simply fade away, yielding to younger, more beautiful women.  So, based on the these western ideals, the female characters in the film struggle with aging and the loss of their youthful appearance – leading to the practice of body concealment:  the willingness to do or pay whatever it takes “to maintain a feminine/gendered body [and] maintain an unchanging body.” (Dillaway P. 4) The film presents a world (not unlike our own) where the prospect of losing one’s youth and beauty is even more terrifying than undergoing  plastic surgery, uncomfortable procedures, barely eating or visiting spas that look akin to new-age torture chambers. 

The humorous twist in the film is that while in life, although many wish for it, “there is no necessary cure, no magic pill that will alter the reality of women’s menopausal experience.” (Buchanan, Villagran & Ragan P. 115) the two lead female characters find a magic elixir that restores their youth and beauty.  One would be led to believe that, in having this, eternal youth, beauty, life…that their issues on age and decline would be resolved.  However, the issues are only magnified, as through their physical ‘deaths’, their bodies remain alive and the struggle then becomes a hilarious attempt to maintain their dead bodies through embalming measures and acrylic paints.  And although they are not ‘physically’ aging, the movie hints at the stereotype that their minds are aging – they are becoming forgetful and speak to each other like the media’s stereotype of nattering old women – bickering over who lost their can of spray paint, because neither can  remember where it is and persist in blaming the other.  Over the years, they have maimed their bodies several times, so eventually they start to limp and totter – like older women developing osteoarthritis.   And in the end, there is still all of the jealousy, competitiveness and cattiness that there ever was.  For the women, even with the promise of eternal youth, nothing had changed. 

“The theory of aging includes psychological constructs such as attitudes.  How we socially construct the female aging process affects our behaviors, perceptions of, and communication with women throughout the lifespan.  From a developmental perspective, aging should be viewed as a natural life process, not a pathology in need of remedies.  Still there is an unrealistic expectation that women should fight the aging process.”  (Buchanan, Villagran & Ragan P. 109)  So because of what has developed into an unrealistic western view of women and aging, age has become something to be feared and halted to the best of one’s ability.  A lesser character in the film, Lisle von Rhuman, says of aging, “you’re scared of yourself, of the body you thought you once knew…this is life’s ultimate cruelty…it offers us the taste of youth and vitality and then makes us witness our own decay.”( Zemeckis 1993)  And according to Western medical and popular literature, age and menopause [are] reduced to signs and symptoms – “equating age with rotting.”(Buchanan, Villagran & Ragan P. 99)  The film, through the medium of comedy, parallel’s real life.  For example, in life, Dr. Robert Wilson’s book “Feminine Forever” hails the use of HRTs to ‘cure’ menopause – so women will no longer be “condemned to witness the death of their own womanhood”( Buchanan, Villagran & Ragan P. 100), while in the film, the character Helen Sharp writes a best-selling book entitled, Forever Young outlining her own advice for retaining one’s youthful appearance, (and similar to HRT, she ingests a magic elixir that restores her youth and vitality), Both insinuating and accepting as the norm that all women fear the loss of their beauty and youth and that working to halt the aging process must be made a priority.

Throughout the ages, in regards to society’s perceptions of aging, there appear to have always been “two standards of male beauty: they boy and the man, but only one standard of female beauty:  the girl.”(Mandell, Wilson & Duffy P. 26)   This is mirrored by when Madeline ingests the elixir and her body begins to change, she exclaims, “I’m a girl!” (Zemeckis 1993)  By the vicious circle of giving the public what it feels it wants, popular media then also plays a very large role in perpetuating this western view of the aging woman.  “The public perceives the media to be the source of most of its health-related information.  Americans spend most of their leisure time engaged in some type of mass media use.  Therefore media influence our perceptions and everyday lives.” (Buchanan, Villagran & Ragan P. 113) All anyone has to do is pick up a random magazine or flip through the channels on the television and it doesn’t take very long at all to hypothesize on what western society considers beautiful – the girl:  young, healthy, energetic, slim, well-maintained, and attractive.  To a woman who is aging and trying to cope with the new changes taking place in her body, it often must appear as though with the exception of her, the rest of the world is just filled with younger, slimmer more beautiful women.  And with that being said, it is my belief that the media does then continue to perpetuate the view of the aging woman in a negative light, as it does precious little to help present it in a wholly positive light.  Cosmetic companies still treat age as something to be hidden and masked through hair dye, cosmetics, anti-aging creams, body slimming creams, etc… and one look in your own neighborhood will show all the new ‘medical spas’ opening – offering non-surgical anti aging procedures such as Botox.  And while some older women are now finally appearing in some of the new cosmetic ads (ie. Ellen DeGeneres), they are depicted as though by using these products; they look much younger than their actual years – again working towards age concealment. And it starts early – as even children’s books are often guilty of perpetuating ageism:  with stories of wicked witches, always portrayed by older women vs. the heroine – a beautiful, young princess, with whom the prince always falls in love. (O’Beirne P. 14)   

Although, admittedly, times are (very) slowly changing, and while still predominantly negative, I believe have been some small gains towards positive change.  As more and more women are living longer and beginning to learn to try and embrace getting older, in turn, there are a few ads out there that also work to embrace this new concept such as the recent Dove soap ads – which depict women of all ages, ethnicities and body types as beautiful. 

The message that I feel this film is sending to the public about older women is that an obsession with youth and physical appearance is both ridiculous and shallow.  They should be more like (the stereotype of) men, in the sense that they need to stop fixating on looking young and be more preoccupied with living young and creating a life of meaning.  It also highlights the different way that society views men aging to that of women.  In the film, Ernest (the love interest of Madeline and Helen), refuses the magic elixir – not wanting to live forever for fear of boredom, being lonely and watching loved ones die without him – nothing shallow there.  While when presented with the prospect of being young again, the women are all too eager to drink the potion without a second thought.  The film implied that there is more to life than one’s appearance.  A focus on predominately the physical could mean missing out on a lot of wonderful things in life – healthy, supportive relationships with others, family, activities you may have wanted to do but never had the time. 

“…Social constructions of women’s external appearances or public bodies no not accommodate change, in that women’s appearances should remain the same over time; any visible alternations are ideologically defined as “negative,” abnormal,” or “deviant”.  (Dillaway P. 4)  At 50, our western society and our media could have women convinced that life is pretty much over.  At 50 for men (and as reinforced in the film) – life is often just beginning.  Men are still virile – they can create children, obtain younger wives, and pursue academics and an active outdoor life.  Instead of focusing on how to make themselves look younger, they live younger – and the film strongly implies this perspective during the final scene of the film.  In this scene, the leading women are at Ernest’s funeral.  He has died a very old man.  Many years back, at the age of 50, Ernest managed to escape Madeline and Helen, and began his life anew.  In his eulogy, the priest comments how Ernest had felt life began at 50 and for Ernest it had, because nothing much was known of him before that time.  At 50, he met his wife Claire and had 2 sons and 4 daughters.  He was a brilliant academic, an outdoorsman; and  never pursued selfish ambitions, choosing, instead to enhance the world to make it a better place than what he found it, by founding the Menville Marriage Counseling Clinic, the Menville Centre for the Study of Women and an AA Chapter.  He would be remembered for his wonderful sense of humor – with his tall tales of ‘the living dead of Beverley Hills’.  The priest felt that in his own way, Ernest had learned the secret of eternal life and youth – and was a man who would “indeed live forever” – living in the hearts of his friends, family, children and grandchildren.  And to this, Madeline and Helen, still obsessed with the preservation of their looks, leave the church muttering, blah, blah, blah…, and being such shallow ‘women’, entirely miss the point.  (Zemeckis 1993)

While approaching middle-age myself, I found that through all the laughs and extremist stereotypes in this film, there was a significant message buried underneath the humor of Death Becomes Her.  Just like both Madeline and Helen each had their own personal reasons for wanting to remain young, when it comes to being a woman and getting older – in real life, the process of aging (or not wanting to age) is very personal to every woman.  While we are all women, we are all still individuals who are products of our upbringings, educations, life experiences and life situations… and while it is natural not to be excited about certain aspects of aging (such as the specific aliments that bodies will normally experience with age), we do need to remember that everyone ages.  Charity begins at home – and women, who are by nature, caregivers/nurturers who historically put the needs of others before their own, need to start caring for and nurturing themselves. 

I believe that an acceptance of aging comes with finding satisfaction with one’s own life and with who you are as a person: your personal achievements and accomplishments – what is uniquely meaningful to you.  It’s about finding the validity of your own life and whether or not you are satisfied with that.  And while I haven’t personally performed a study, I could hypothesize that the majority of women who are happy with their lives feel better about aging than those women who have a lesser life satisfaction.  (Deeks & McCabe, P. 396)

If a woman is truly disturbed and dissatisfied about getting older, she may want to sit down, take a moment and take stock of the reasons why.  And while some reasons may be similar between women, could there be other ‘emotional’ reasons why aging appears so troubling – such as worries that the opposite sex/your partner will no longer find you desirable or that people may no longer take you seriously?  Could these worries potentially stem from a personal lack of confidence that, on some level, may have always been there?  Women may need to reflect upon what is truly important to them and if they feel their reasons are wholly valid, and if who they are is that tied into their physical appearance, then by all means, break out the Botox!

Personally, I feel that at any age, but especially as we approach middle age, women need to surround themselves with support – with women their own age so they can look for similarities and not feel so isolated in the aging process.  To know that there are other women who may be experiencing similar feelings and issues can be a source of tremendous comfort and reassurance.  Because, in the end – everyone ages, and while people may age differently, we all age – at least, if we’re lucky – because the only true alternative to aging, is death.  


Buchanan, M. Villagran, M. & Ragan, S. (2001) Women, menopause and (Ms.) information: Communication about the climacteric. Health Communication, 14(1), 99-119.

Dillaway, H. (2005) (Un) Changing menopausal bodies: How women think and act in the face of a reproductive transition and gendered beauty ideals. Sex Roles, 53 (1-2) 1-17.

Deeks, A. & McCabe, M (2004) Well-being and menopause: An investigation of purpose in life, self-acceptance and social role in premenopausal, peri-menopausal and postmenopausal women. Quality of Life Research, 13, 389-398.

Hurst S. & Andsagar  J.  (2003)  Medicalization vs adaptive models? Sense-making in magazine framing of menopause. Women and Health, 38(1), 101-122.

Mandell, N., Wilson, S & Duffy, A. (2008) Connection, Compromise , and Control : Canadian Women Discuss Midlife.  Canada:  Oxford University Press

O’Beirne, N. (1999) Growing older, getting better: Than what? In Onyx, J., Leonard, R., & Reed, R. Revisioning aging: Empowerment of older women (pp. 8-20). New York, NY: Peter Lang.

Zemeckis, R (Producer/Director). (1993). Death Becomes Her [Motion Picture]. United States: Universal Pictures